Friday, 6 January 2023

Veer Savarkar

He is a writer, freedam fight, advocate and he is the one of brilliant student 

Book written: Hindutva, The Indian War of independence 1857, Inside the enemy camp, Hindu Rashtra Darshan

Born: 28 May 1883, Bhaghur, Nasik, District: Bombay (Mumbai).

Died: 26 February 1966 Bombay, Maharashtra, India

Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, by name Vir or Veer, Hindu and Indian nationalist and a leading figure in the Hindu Mahasabha (“Great Society of Hindus”), a Hindu nationalist organization and political party.

While a student of law in London(1906–10), Savarkar helped to instruct a group of Indian revolutionaries in methods of sabotage and assassination that associates of his had apparently learned from expatriate Russian revolutionaries in Paris. During this period he wrote The Indian War of Independence, 1857 (1909), in which he took the view that the Indian Mutiny of 1857 was the first expression of Indian mass rebellion against British colonial rule.

In March 1910 Savarkar was arrested on various charges relating to subversion and incitement to war and was sent to India for trial and convicted. In a second trial he was convicted of his alleged complicity in the assassination of a British district magistrate in India, and, after sentencing, he was transported to the Andaman Islands for detention “for life.” He was brought back to India in 1921 and released from detention in 1924. While imprisoned he wrote Hindutva, who is Hindu? (1923), coining the term Hindutva, which sought to define Indian culture as a manifestation of Hindu values; this concept grew to become a major tenet of Hindu nationalist ideology. 

Savarkar resided in Ratnagiri until 1937, when he joined the Hindu Mahasabha, which militantly defended the Hindus’ claims of religious and cultural supremacy over Indian Muslims. He served as president of the Mahasabha for seven years. In 1943 he retired to Bombay. When Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was assassinated in 1948 by a former member of the Mahasabha, Savarkar was implicated, but he was acquitted in his subsequent trial because of insufficient evidence.

No comments:

Post a Comment